The renewal spreadsheet tells a CMO which contracts are coming due. It shows usage, price and who owns each one. The person it lists as owner of each tool is almost never the person carrying work between them. It cannot show how often a campaign manager copies a brief from one application to another, asks a colleague to fix a broken data connection, or retypes instructions that already exist in another tool.

Put the campaign next to the contract.

Pick a campaign that recently went live. Ask the person who ran it to retrace the path from approved brief to live assets. Note the proof, the audience data, the design decisions and the approval at each step. Then mark every point where a person carried something from one tool to the next. That shows whether an AI feature took work out of the campaign or only sped up one part of it.

Q7

Where the current tools create the most friction

Overlapping AI features without a clear owner16%
90 responses
Moving information manually between systems27%
155 responses
Contracts or existing spend delay a better-fit approach10%
60 responses
Company methods are embedded in tools that are difficult to change17%
99 responses
Integration and maintenance consume the expected savings18%
104 responses
Our existing estate meets our current needs9%
53 responses
Don’t know3%
17 responses
578 people answered. All listed answers, including don’t know, stay in the total. Full readout and cross-tabs ↗

A heavily used tool may still be the right purchase. Gartner’s finding that teams use about half of the marketing technology they buy is a reason to look. It does not tell your company which license to cancel. That decision needs the finished task, its quality and the work around the application. Losing a specialist capability can cost more than the subscription saved.

Gartner, marketing technology utilization research

Find the company decisions inside the software.

Ask marketing ops for a list of every custom rule, scoring model and template configured inside each tool. Then ask sales, partner marketing and brand who wrote each one and whether it is written down anywhere else. What is on the first list and not the second is the switching cost the license price does not show.

Ask the team to keep its method in a form a second approved provider could use. Run the same ten accounts with the same proof and the same standard for an acceptable brief through that second provider. Compare the work it took to get there, as well as the price. If the second provider holds up, you have a negotiating position at renewal even if you never switch.

Q8

What happened the last time a team considered switching provider?

We changed the provider and kept most of the workflow12%
53 responses
We rebuilt some parts and retained others26%
120 responses
We had to rebuild most of the workflow34%
154 responses
We decided not to change because of the required effort28%
128 responses
455 people answered. 126 people who had not considered a change, had no recurring AI workflow or did not know are left out of this comparison. Full readout and cross-tabs ↗

A practical test before you switch provider

What stays yours

  • Which accounts deserve attention
  • Approved claims and proof
  • The brief format and what gets rejected
  • Ten real examples to test quality against

What you compare

Run the same task with the current provider and a second approved provider.

Compare accepted briefs, factual errors, cost and upkeep before choosing.

A suggested decision process. Being able to plug in a different provider does not mean its answers will match.

OpenRouter, routing requests across AI providers

Match what you buy to how often you need it.

A team that lives in a specialist application may need the whole thing. A monthly step that adds missing details to a partner account list may need one capability. Some services now sell that one step by the task. Put the occasional steps on marketing ops’ budget rather than the requesting team’s, so one person sees all the pay-per-use spend, and compare total cost, data rights and reliability before assuming it is cheaper.

Treg, pay-per-task access to specialist marketing tools

Give marketing ops the authority to act on what the campaign review finds. Remove one repeated handoff or duplicate instruction, record what that did to launch effort and take that evidence into the renewal. Ask the team lead who runs the campaign to confirm it still has what it needs. Then repeat the exercise for the next big contract, with a real task instead of a feature comparison.

Bring this discussion to your GTM team.

The team benchmark and workshop connects the operating questions with your own workflows, priorities and people.

Request the team benchmark and workshop ↗